Claim 1:
Molina GF, Faulks D, Mulder J, Frencken JE. High-viscosity glass-ionomer vs. composite resin restorations in persons with disability: Five-year follow-up of clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2019 Nov 25;33:e099.


Claim 2:
Molina GF, Faulks D, Mazzola I, Mulder J, Frencken JE. One year survival of ART and conventional restorations in patients with disability. BMC Oral Health. 2014 May 7;14:49.

Molina GF, Faulks D, Mulder J, Frencken JE. High-viscosity glass-ionomer vs. composite resin restorations in persons with disability: Five-year follow-up of clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2019 Nov 25;33:e099.

Claims 3 - 5:
Chemfil Rock
Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet

IFU Link
Especially designed for
Claim 1: Semi-permanent restorations of Class I and II cavities in posterior teeth.

In addition suitable for:
Claim 2: Restoration of deciduous teeth.
Claim 3: Restoration of Class V lesions and cavities.
Claim 4: Restoration of Class III cavities.
Claim 5: Base/core-build-up. When used as a core-build-up, 2/3 of the remaining coronal dentin or at least 2 mm of circumferential coronal dentin should be left for retention.  

 
 
 
 
 
Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
(c) RCHSR
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 1 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
Molina GF, Faulks D, Mazzola I, Cabral RJ, Mulder J, Frencken JE. Three-year survival of ART high-viscosity glass-ionomer and resin composite restorations in people with disability. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jan;22(1):461-467.
Claim 1:
Mobarak E, El-Deeb H, Daifalla LE, Ghaly M, Mustafa M, Sabry D, Fatah H, Mulder J, Creugers NHJ, Frencken JE. Survival of multiple-surface ART restorations using a zinc-reinforced glass-ionomer restorative after 2 years: A randomized triple-blind clinical trial. Dent Mater. 2019 Sep;35(9):e185-e192.

Claim 2:
Gok Baba M, Kirzioglu Z, Ceyhan D. One-year clinical evaluation of two high-viscosity glass-ionomer cements in class II restorations of primary molars. Aust Dent J. 2021 Mar;66(1):32-40.
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0